Brahmagupta
Brahmagupta (Sanskrit: ब्रह्मगुप्त) (598–668) was an
Indian mathematician and astronomer. Brahmagupta wrote important works
on mathematics and astronomy. In particular he wrote Brahmasphutasiddhanta
(Correctly Established Doctrine of Brahma), in 628. The work was
written in 25 chapters and Brahmagupta tells us in the text that he
wrote it at Bhillamal which today is the city of Bhinmal. This was the
capital of the lands ruled by the Gurjara dynasty.
Life and work
Brahmagupta was born in 598 CE(it is believed) in Bhinmal city in the
state of Rajasthan of northwest India. He likely lived most of his life
in Bhillamala (modern Bhinmal in Rajasthan) in the empire of Harsha
during the reign (and possibly under the patronage) of King
Vyaghramukha.[1] As a result, Brahmagupta is often referred to as
Bhillamalacarya, that is, the teacher from Bhillamala Bhinmal. He was
the head of the astronomical observatory at Ujjain, and during his
tenure there wrote four texts on mathematics and astronomy: the
Cadamekela in 624, the Brahmasphutasiddhanta in 628, the Khandakhadyaka
in 665, and the Durkeamynarda in 672. The Brahmasphutasiddhanta
(Corrected Treatise of Brahma) is arguably his most famous work. The
historian al-Biruni (c. 1050) in his book Tariq al-Hind states that the
Abbasid caliph al-Ma'mun had an embassy in India and from India a book
was brought to Baghdad which was translated into Arabic as Sindhind. It
is generally presumed that Sindhind is none other than Brahmagupta's
Brahmasphuta-siddhanta.
Although Brahmagupta was familiar with the works of astronomers
following the tradition of Aryabhatiya, it is not known if he was
familiar with the work of Bhaskara I, a contemporary. Brahmagupta had a
plethora of criticism directed towards the work of rival astronomers,
and in his Brahmasphutasiddhanta is found one of the earliest attested
schisms among Indian mathematicians. The division was primarily about
the application of mathematics to the physical world, rather than about
the mathematics itself. In Brahmagupta's case, the disagreements stemmed
largely from the choice of astronomical parameters and theories.
Critiques of rival theories appear throughout the first ten astronomical
chapters and the eleventh chapter is entirely devoted to criticism of
these theories, although no criticisms appear in the twelfth and
eighteenth chapters.
Mathematics
Brahmagupta's most famous work is his Brahmasphutasiddhanta. It is
composed in elliptic verse, as was common practice in Indian
mathematics, and consequently has a poetic ring to it. As no proofs are
given, it is not known how Brahmagupta's mathematics was derived.
Algebra
Brahmagupta gave the solution of the general linear equation in chapter eighteen of Brahmasphutasiddhanta,
18.43 The difference between rupas, when inverted and divided by the
difference of the unknowns, is the unknown in the equation. The rupas
are [subtracted on the side] below that from which the square and the
unknown are to be subtracted.
Which is a solution equivalent to x = \tfrac{e-c}{b-d}, where rupas
represents constants. He further gave two equivalent solutions to the
general quadratic equation,
18.44. Diminish by the middle [number] the square-root of the rupas
multiplied by four times the square and increased by the square of the
middle [number]; divide the remainder by twice the square. [The result
is] the middle [number].
18.45. Whatever is the square-root of the rupas multiplied by the square [and] increased by the square of half the unknown, diminish that by half the unknown [and] divide [the remainder] by its square. [The result is] the unknown.
18.45. Whatever is the square-root of the rupas multiplied by the square [and] increased by the square of half the unknown, diminish that by half the unknown [and] divide [the remainder] by its square. [The result is] the unknown.
Which are, respectively, solutions equivalent to,
x = \frac{\sqrt{4ac+b^2}-b}{2a}
and
x = \frac{\sqrt{ac+\tfrac{b^2}{4}}-\tfrac{b}{2}}{a}
He went on to solve systems of simultaneous indeterminate equations
stating that the desired variable must first be isolated, and then the
equation must be divided by the desired variable's coefficient. In
particular, he recommended using "the pulverizer" to solve equations
with multiple unknowns.
18.51. Subtract the colors different from the first color. [The
remainder] divided by the first [color's coefficient] is the measure of
the first. [Terms] two by two [are] considered [when reduced to] similar
divisors, [and so on] repeatedly. If there are many [colors], the
pulverizer [is to be used].
Like the algebra of Diophantus, the algebra of Brahmagupta was
syncopated. Addition was indicated by placing the numbers side by side,
subtraction by placing a dot over the subtrahend, and division by
placing the divisor below the dividend, similar to our notation but
without the bar. Multiplication, evolution, and unknown quantities were
represented by abbreviations of appropriate terms.[5] The extent of
Greek influence on this syncopation, if any, is not known and it is
possible that both Greek and Indian syncopation may be derived from a
common Babylonian source.
Arithmetic
In the beginning of chapter twelve of his Brahmasphutasiddhanta,
entitled Calculation, Brahmagupta details operations on fractions. The
reader is expected to know the basic arithmetic operations as far as
taking the square root, although he explains how to find the cube and
cube-root of an integer and later gives rules facilitating the
computation of squares and square roots. He then gives rules for dealing
with five types of combinations of fractions, \tfrac{a}{c} +
\tfrac{b}{c}, \tfrac{a}{c} \cdot \tfrac{b}{d}, \tfrac{a}{1} +
\tfrac{b}{d}, \tfrac{a}{c} + \tfrac{b}{d} \cdot \tfrac{a}{c} =
\tfrac{a(d+b)}{cd}, and \tfrac{a}{c} - \tfrac{b}{d} \cdot \tfrac{a}{c} =
\tfrac{a(d-b)}{cd}.
Series
Brahmagupta then goes on to give the sum of the squares and cubes of the first n integers.
12.20. The sum of the squares is that [sum] multiplied by twice the
[number of] step[s] increased by one [and] divided by three. The sum of
the cubes is the square of that [sum] Piles of these with identical
balls [can also be computed].
It is important to note here Brahmagupta found the result in terms of
the sum of the first n integers, rather than in terms of n as is the
modern practice.
He gives the sum of the squares of the first n natural numbers as
n(n+1)(2n+1)/6 and the sum of the cubes of the first n natural numbers
as (n(n+1)/2)².
Zero
Brahmaguptasiddhanta is the very first book that mentions zero as a
number. hence Brahmagupta is considered as the man who found zero. He
gave rules of using zero with other numbers. Zero plus a positive number
is the positive number etc. Brahmagupta made use of an important
concept in mathematics, the number zero. The Brahmasphutasiddhanta is
the earliest known text to treat zero as a number in its own right,
rather than as simply a placeholder digit in representing another number
as was done by the Babylonians or as a symbol for a lack of quantity as
was done by Ptolemy and the Romans. In chapter eighteen of his
Brahmasphutasiddhanta, Brahmagupta describes operations on negative
numbers. He first describes addition and subtraction,
18.30. [The sum] of two positives is positives, of two negatives
negative; of a positive and a negative [the sum] is their difference; if
they are equal it is zero. The sum of a negative and zero is negative,
[that] of a positive and zero positive, [and that] of two zeros zero.
[…]
18.32. A negative minus zero is negative, a positive [minus zero] positive; zero [minus zero] is zero. When a positive is to be subtracted from a negative or a negative from a positive, then it is to be added.
[…]
18.32. A negative minus zero is negative, a positive [minus zero] positive; zero [minus zero] is zero. When a positive is to be subtracted from a negative or a negative from a positive, then it is to be added.
He goes on to describe multiplication,
18.33. The product of a negative and a positive is negative, of two
negatives positive, and of positives positive; the product of zero and a
negative, of zero and a positive, or of two zeros is zero.
But his description of division by zero differs from our modern understanding,
18.34. A positive divided by a positive or a negative divided by a
negative is positive; a zero divided by a zero is zero; a positive
divided by a negative is negative; a negative divided by a positive is
[also] negative.
18.35. A negative or a positive divided by zero has that [zero] as its divisor, or zero divided by a negative or a positive [has that negative or positive as its divisor]. The square of a negative or of a positive is positive; [the square] of zero is zero. That of which [the square] is the square is [its] square-root.
18.35. A negative or a positive divided by zero has that [zero] as its divisor, or zero divided by a negative or a positive [has that negative or positive as its divisor]. The square of a negative or of a positive is positive; [the square] of zero is zero. That of which [the square] is the square is [its] square-root.
Here Brahmagupta states that \tfrac{0}{0} = 0 and as for the question
of \tfrac{a}{0} where a \neq 0 he did not commit himself. His rules for
arithmetic on negative numbers and zero are quite close to the modern
understanding, except that in modern mathematics division by zero is
left undefined.
Diophantine analysis
Pythagorean triples
In chapter twelve of his Brahmasphutasiddhanta, Brahmagupta finds Pythagorean triples,
12.39. The height of a mountain multiplied by a given multiplier is
the distance to a city; it is not erased. When it is divided by the
multiplier increased by two it is the leap of one of the two who make
the same journey.
or in other words, for a given length m and an arbitrary multiplier
x, let a = mx and b = m + mx/(x + 2). Then m, a, and b form a
Pythagorean triple.
[edit] Pell's equation
[edit] Pell's equation
Brahmagupta went on to give a recurrence relation for generating
solutions to certain instances of Diophantine equations of the second
degree such as Nx2 + 1 = y2 (called Pell's equation) by using the
Euclidean algorithm. The Euclidean algorithm was known to him as the
"pulverizer" since it breaks numbers down into ever smaller pieces.
The nature of squares:
18.64. [Put down] twice the square-root of a given square by a multiplier and increased or diminished by an arbitrary [number]. The product product of the first [pair], multiplied by the multiplier, with the product of the last [pair], is the last computed.
18.65. The sum of the thunderbolt products is the first. The additive is equal to the product of the additives. The two square-roots, divided by the additive or the subtractive, are the additive rupas.
18.64. [Put down] twice the square-root of a given square by a multiplier and increased or diminished by an arbitrary [number]. The product product of the first [pair], multiplied by the multiplier, with the product of the last [pair], is the last computed.
18.65. The sum of the thunderbolt products is the first. The additive is equal to the product of the additives. The two square-roots, divided by the additive or the subtractive, are the additive rupas.
The key to his solution was the identity,[11]
(x^2_1 - Ny^2_1)(x^2_2 - Ny^2_2) = (x_1 x_2 + Ny_1 y_2)^2 - N(x_1 y_2 + x_2 y_1)^2
which is a generalization of an identity that was discovered by Diophantus,
(x^2_1 - y^2_1)(x^2_2 - y^2_2) = (x_1 x_2 + y_1 y_2)^2 - (x_1 y_2 + x_2 y_1)^2.
Using his identity and the fact that if (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are
solutions to the equations x2 − Ny2 = k1 and x2 − Ny2 = k2,
respectively, then (x1x2 + Ny1y2, x1y2 + x2y1) is a solution to x2 − Ny2
= k1k2, he was able to find integral solutions to the Pell's equation
through a series of equations of the form x2 − Ny2 = ki. Unfortunately,
Brahmagupta was not able to apply his solution uniformly for all
possible values of N, rather he was only able to show that if x2 − Ny2 =
k has an integral solution for k = ±1, ±2, or ±4, then x2 − Ny2 = 1 has
a solution. The solution of the general Pell's equation would have to
wait for Bhaskara II in c. 1150 CE.
Geometry
Brahmagupta's formula
Brahmagupta's most famous result in geometry is his formula for
cyclic quadrilaterals. Given the lengths of the sides of any cyclic
quadrilateral, Brahmagupta gave an approximate and an exact formula for
the figure's area,
12.21. The approximate area is the product of the halves of the sums
of the sides and opposite sides of a triangle and a quadrilateral. The
accurate [area] is the square root from the product of the halves of the
sums of the sides diminished by [each] side of the quadrilateral.
So given the lengths p, q, r and s of a cyclic quadrilateral, the
approximate area is (\tfrac{p + r}{2}) (\tfrac{q + s}{2}) while, letting
t = \tfrac{p + q + r + s}{2}, the exact area is
\sqrt{(t - p)(t - q)(t - r)(t - s)}.
Although Brahmagupta does not explicitly state that these
quadrilaterals are cyclic, it is apparent from his rules that this is
the case. Heron's formula is a special case of this formula and it can
be derived by setting one of the sides equal to zero.
Triangles
Brahmagupta dedicated a substantial portion of his work to geometry.
One theorem states that the two lengths of a triangle's base when
divided by its altitude then follows,
12.22. The base decreased and increased by the difference between the
squares of the sides divided by the base; when divided by two they are
the true segments. The perpendicular [altitude] is the square-root from
the square of a side diminished by the square of its segment.
Thus the lengths of the two segments are (1/2)b \pm (c^2 - a^2)/b.
He further gives a theorem on rational triangles. A triangle with rational sides a, b, c and rational area is of the form:
a = \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{u^2}{v}+v\right), \ \ b =
\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{u^2}{w}+w\right), \ \ c =
\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{u^2}{v} - v + \frac{u^2}{w} - w\right)
for some rational numbers u, v, and w.[13]
Brahmagupta's theorem
Brahmagupta's theorem states that AF = FD.
Brahmagupta continues,
12.23. The square-root of the sum of the two products of the sides
and opposite sides of a non-unequal quadrilateral is the diagonal. The
square of the diagonal is diminished by the square of half the sum of
the base and the top; the square-root is the perpendicular
[altitudes].[7]
So, in a "non-unequal" cyclic quadrilateral (that is, an isosceles trapezoid), the length of each diagonal is \sqrt{pr + qs}.
He continues to give formulas for the lengths and areas of geometric
figures, such as the circumradius of an isosceles trapezoid and a
scalene quadrilateral, and the lengths of diagonals in a scalene cyclic
quadrilateral. This leads up to Brahmagupta's famous theorem,
12.30-31. Imaging two triangles within [a cyclic quadrilateral] with
unequal sides, the two diagonals are the two bases. Their two segments
are separately the upper and lower segments [formed] at the intersection
of the diagonals. The two [lower segments] of the two diagonals are two
sides in a triangle; the base [of the quadrilateral is the base of the
triangle]. Its perpendicular is the lower portion of the [central]
perpendicular; the upper portion of the [central] perpendicular is half
of the sum of the [sides] perpendiculars diminished by the lower
[portion of the central perpendicular].
Pi
In verse 40, he gives values of π,
12.40. The diameter and the square of the radius [each] multiplied by
3 are [respectively] the practical circumference and the area [of a
circle]. The accurate [values] are the square-roots from the squares of
those two multiplied by ten.
So Brahmagupta uses 3 as a "practical" value of π, and \sqrt{10} as an "accurate" value of π.
Measurements and constructions
In some of the verses before verse 40, Brahmagupta gives
constructions of various figures with arbitrary sides. He essentially
manipulated right triangles to produce isosceles triangles, scalene
triangles, rectangles, isosceles trapezoids, isosceles trapezoids with
three equal sides, and a scalene cyclic quadrilateral.
After giving the value of pi, he deals with the geometry of plane
figures and solids, such as finding volumes and surface areas (or empty
spaces dug out of solids). He finds the volume of rectangular prisms,
pyramids, and the frustum of a square pyramid. He further finds the
average depth of a series of pits. For the volume of a frustum of a
pyramid, he gives the "pragmatic" value as the depth times the square of
the mean of the edges of the top and bottom faces, and he gives the
"superficial" volume as the depth times their mean area.
Trigonometry
Sine table
In Chapter 2 of his Brahmasphutasiddhanta, entitled Planetary True Longitudes, Brahmagupta presents a sine table:
2.2-5. The sines: The Progenitors, twins; Ursa Major, twins, the
Vedas; the gods, fires, six; flavors, dice, the gods; the moon, five,
the sky, the moon; the moon, arrows, suns […]
Here Brahmagupta uses names of objects to represent the digits of
place-value numerals, as was common with numerical data in Sanskrit
treatises. Progenitors represents the 14 Progenitors ("Manu") in Indian
cosmology or 14, "twins" means 2, "Ursa Major" represents the seven
stars of Ursa Major or 7, "Vedas" refers to the 4 Vedas or 4, dice
represents the number of sides of the tradition die or 6, and so on.
This information can be translated into the list of sines, 214, 427,
638, 846, 1051, 1251, 1446, 1635, 1817, 1991, 2156, 2312, 1459, 2594,
2719, 2832, 2933, 3021, 3096, 3159, 3207, 3242, 3263, and 3270, with the
radius being 3270.
Interpolation formula
In 665 Brahmagupta devised and used a special case of the
Newton-Stirling interpolation formula of the second-order to interpolate
new values of the sine function from other values already tabulated.
The formula gives an estimate for the value of a function f at a value a
+ xh of its argument (with h > 0 and −1 ≤ x ≤ 1) when its value is
already known at a − h, a and a + h.
The formula for the estimate is:
f( a + x h ) \approx f(a) + x \left(\frac{\Delta f(a) + \Delta f(a-h)}{2}\right) + \frac{x^2 \Delta^2 f(a-h)}{2!}.
where Δ is the first-order forward-difference operator, i.e.
\Delta f(a) \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ f(a+h) - f(a).
Astronomy
It was through the Brahmasphutasiddhanta that the Arabs learned of
Indian astronomy. The famous Abbasid caliph Al-Mansur (712–775) founded
Baghdad, which is situated on the banks of the Tigris, and made it a
center of learning. The caliph invited a scholar of Ujjain by the name
of Kankah in 770 A.D. Kankah used the Brahmasphutasiddhanta to explain
the Hindu system of arithmetic astronomy. Muhammad al-Fazari translated
Brahmugupta's work into Arabic upon the request of the caliph.
In chapter seven of his Brahmasphutasiddhanta, entitled Lunar
Crescent, Brahmagupta rebuts the idea that the Moon is farther from the
Earth than the Sun, an idea which is maintained in scriptures. He does
this by explaining the illumination of the Moon by the Sun.
7.1. If the moon were above the sun, how would the power of waxing
and waning, etc., be produced from calculation of the [longitude of the]
moon? the near half [would be] always bright.
7.2. In the same way that the half seen by the sun of a pot standing in sunlight is bright, and the unseen half dark, so is [the illumination] of the moon [if it is] beneath the sun.
7.3. The brightness is increased in the direction of the sun. At the end of a bright [i.e. waxing] half-month, the near half is bright and the far half dark. Hence, the elevation of the horns [of the crescent can be derived] from calculation. […]
7.2. In the same way that the half seen by the sun of a pot standing in sunlight is bright, and the unseen half dark, so is [the illumination] of the moon [if it is] beneath the sun.
7.3. The brightness is increased in the direction of the sun. At the end of a bright [i.e. waxing] half-month, the near half is bright and the far half dark. Hence, the elevation of the horns [of the crescent can be derived] from calculation. […]
He explains that since the Moon is closer to the Earth than the Sun,
the degree of the illuminated part of the Moon depends on the relative
positions of the Sun and the Moon, and this can be computed from the
size of the angle between the two bodies.
Some of the important contributions made by Brahmagupta in astronomy
are: methods for calculating the position of heavenly bodies over time
(ephemerides), their rising and setting, conjunctions, and the
calculation of solar and lunar eclipses. Brahmagupta criticized the
Puranic view that the Earth was flat or hollow. Instead, he observed
that the Earth and heaven were spherical and that the Earth is moving.
In 1030, the Muslim astronomer Abu al-Rayhan al-Biruni, in his Ta'rikh
al-Hind, later translated into Latin as Indica, commented on
Brahmagupta's work and wrote that critics argued:
"If such were the case, stones would and trees would fall from the earth."
According to al-Biruni, Brahmagupta responded to these criticisms with the following argument on gravitation:
"On the contrary, if that were the case, the earth would not vie in keeping an even and uniform pace with the minutes of heaven, the pranas of the times. […] All heavy things are attracted towards the center of the earth. […] The earth on all its sides is the same; all people on earth stand upright, and all heavy things fall down to the earth by a law of nature, for it is the nature of the earth to attract and to keep things, as it is the nature of water to flow, that of fire to burn, and that of wind to set in motion… The earth is the only low thing, and seeds always return to it, in whatever direction you may throw them away, and never rise upwards from the earth."
About the Earth's gravity he said:
"Bodies fall towards the earth as it is in the nature of the earth to attract bodies, just as it is in the nature of water to flow.
No comments:
Post a Comment